Henry should then keep a close watch in the next two weeks to ensure the team members communicate smoothly with each other. The main group consists of the three founding members Sasha, Igor and Roman. The short-term goal must be to complete the business plan for the HBS contest, while the long-term goal must be to successfully launch and grow MGIs business.
While the addition of more voices at the table might seem like a way to end the disagreement about the direction of the project, it instead resulted in more opinions and the creation of groups within the group, each working in opposition to the other.
The conflict is noticed by Henry and Igor, and Igor steps in to resolve the issue. Henry and Dana wanted to join the HBS business plan contest to test their abilities so for them the goal is to develop a business plan in time for the contest.
The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Henry took the role of compromiser to resolve the conflict between Sasha and Dana. The divided team failed to agree upon the target market Education vs.
They also have a leveling effect, requiring members to focus on the collective effort necessary rather than any differences in title or status"[footnoteRef: The third person is relied upon by the other two for his business savvy.
At the same time, they did not utilise all the team members abilities as well. One way to glean a few answers as to why this project did not succeed is to use the 5 Whys method discussed in Systems Thinking. The goal of the project, to create and market a piece of software designed to help people better understand music and create it, began with a small group.
Per Eisenhardt, Focus on facts[footnoteRef: The third strength identified was the complementary skill sets contributing from the various team members and their commitment to the business. For example, he views Igor as someone who possesses great charisma, but is incapable of articulating anything to do with the business.
The divided team failed to agree upon the target market Education vs.
Dana adds a critical perspective by noting that MGI should take a short term and long term viewpoint. What is your evaluation of the MGI s team processes? What were the strengths of the MGI team? They were primarily the three founding members of MGI with each able to stand on its own reputation, talent and skill sets.
Entertainment to choose for the business plan. Dana will present an idea knowing Sasha will disagree.Henry Tam and MGI Team. Learning Objectives Launching a team Managing Diverse members Diagnosing team processes Intervening to improve a dysfunctional team Evaluating team effectiveness Case Questions: Henry Tam and the MGI Team 1.
a) What is your evaluation of the MGI s team processes?
Henry and I tried to establish a 1 Jon R. Katzenbach and Douglas K. Smith, The Discipline of Teams, page 3 2 Jeffary T. Polzer, Henry Tam and the MGI team, HBS Casepage 11 3 Jeffary T. Polzer, Henry Tam and the.
Henry Tam/MGI Case - Syllabus PPT Presentation Summary: Henry Tam/MGI Case Case overview The MGI case investigates a team that is comprised of members who are involved in order to participate in a school contest and. Henry Tam and MGI Team Learning Objectives Launching a team Managing Diverse members Diagnosing team processes Intervening to improve a dysfunctional team Evaluating team.
Current: Henry Tam And The Mgi Team Henry Tam And The Mgi Team. Henry Ford. Henry Ford An Entrepreneurial Biography Throughout the birth of the automotive industry there were many attempts by assorted firms to create the first everyday automobile.
Within a short time frame, seven diverse team members assemble to write a business plan for a new company and struggle to define their roles, make decisions together, and resolve conflict.
Henry Tam, a second-year Harvard MBA student, who joins an aspiring start-up company and a fellow classmate to enter the school's business plan contest.